Talk:Wiki witchhunt: Difference between revisions
it's not a wiki witchhunt to assign someone to a Sysop Vandal point of view faction based on their selection of (crappy, inaccurate) sources for articles they republish on CH or whoever
No edit summary |
(it's not a wiki witchhunt to assign someone to a Sysop Vandal point of view faction based on their selection of (crappy, inaccurate) sources for articles they republish on CH or whoever) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
If you want to know more about it, the more anarchist [[Recyclopedia]] studies it, so see their article on it: *http://recyclopedia.info/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=wiki_witchhunt | If you want to know more about it, the more anarchist [[Recyclopedia]] studies it, so see their article on it: *http://recyclopedia.info/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=wiki_witchhunt | ||
:Woops censored by [[sysop vandalism]] via [[denial of service attack]] via [[vandalbot]] via Tim... ooh let's not go there. | |||
------------- | |||
Seems it ''is'' happening here, with emergence of articles like [[Craig Hubley]]. How should [[Consumerium:We|we]] respond? | |||
Is it really the case that someone can write lies about [[Craig Hubley]] but they cannot tell the truth about [[Gus Kouwenhoven]], at [[Consumerium]]? If so what good is it? | |||
-------------- | |||
It seems entirely reasonable to assume that someone is from a [[faction]] espousing [[Sysop Vandal point of view]] if they dredge up old junk articles that have no credibility at all and republish them here after they've died and started to rot. That is neither [[New Troll point of view]] nor is calling someone an advocate of that [[SVpov]] a [[wiki witchhunt]]: there has been no attempt at [[outing]] or even relating the whole thing to an overall strategy by the [[Wikipedia]] [[sysop power structure]]. | |||