Institution: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
*a set of [[institutional buying criteria]] it applies to its own purchases | *a set of [[institutional buying criteria]] it applies to its own purchases | ||
*entities like [[Slow Food]] that define and encourage [[local purchasing]] | *entities like [[Slow Food]] that define and encourage [[local purchasing]] | ||
*the origin or authoritative position-definer of a [[faction]], e.g. Catholics would generally look to the [[Vatican]], an institution, to define their position, while Greens might look to the [[Global Greens]], | *the origin or authoritative position-definer of a [[faction]], e.g. Catholics would generally look to the [[Vatican]], an institution, to define their position, while [[Greens]] might look to the [[Global Greens]], [[Blues]] to the [[WTO]], [[Purples]] to the [[World Bank]], [[trade union]]s to the [[International Labour Organisation]]. | ||
It is sometimes possible to influence various policies of an institution by direct feedback, e.g. a [[wiki]] or writing letters to its officers. This might affect its [[institutional buying criteria]] or help it decide to work through [[Consumerium Services]] and recommend them to its own buyers and suppliers: | |||
For instance [http://www.greenparty.ca/memberzone/tiki-index.php?page=GPC+Platform the Green Party of Canada has a 'living platform' wiki that lets the public edit policy directly]. This might eventually have some influence, direct or indirect, on purchasing policies of the [[Government of Canada]], which purchases hundreds of billions of dollars of goods and services per year. Institutions often have much greater leverage, and are much more intent on avoiding controversy, than individual buyers, although they are much harder to budge. ''If you influence an institution, try to get it involved.'' | |||