User talk:Angela: Difference between revisions
(Juxo, please delete this page again) |
(blocking is for simple vandals... whether or not they are sysop-vandals) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
You asked [[w:User:Cyan]] to do it. | You asked [[w:User:Cyan]] to do it. | ||
:No I didn't. | :No I didn't. | ||
::That's not how a reasonable person would read your dialogue with him. | |||
In any case, you are now a sysop there, and you haven't UNblocked that range. | In any case, you are now a sysop there, and you haven't UNblocked that range. | ||
:Not technically possible even if I wanted to. | :Not technically possible even if I wanted to. | ||
::Interesting. "Not technically possible". You are willing to whine and beg others to CENSOR people, but not to UNCENSOR them. You hide behind what the technology can do, or what you personally are empowered with it to do, when the result would be what you don't like. Another lack of principle. | |||
::It also reveals how afraid the [[GodKing]] and his cabal are - they have to actually use blocks that ordinary sysops can't undo, knowing how strong the appetite for [[m:regime change]] is, and how many friends we have now BECAUSE WE ARE RIGHT. | |||
: | ------------ | ||
Moving some talk relevant to one user's behaviour to a "flames" page is no big deal, but censoring talk files deliberately that outline such habits as relying on [http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=echo_chamber Echo chamber]] lies to excuse excluding people you don't like... that is quite relevant to the mission of this wiki. Keep censoring these things, without answering to any of the detailed points, and sadly there may be a need to ask for you to be blocked. | |||
Blocking is for simple vandals. And that's what you appear now to be. - 142 | |||
Latest revision as of 21:18, 10 February 2004
This claim not to have blocked the 142 ips on simple is a lie.
You asked w:User:Cyan to do it.
- No I didn't.
- That's not how a reasonable person would read your dialogue with him.
In any case, you are now a sysop there, and you haven't UNblocked that range.
- Not technically possible even if I wanted to.
- Interesting. "Not technically possible". You are willing to whine and beg others to CENSOR people, but not to UNCENSOR them. You hide behind what the technology can do, or what you personally are empowered with it to do, when the result would be what you don't like. Another lack of principle.
- It also reveals how afraid the GodKing and his cabal are - they have to actually use blocks that ordinary sysops can't undo, knowing how strong the appetite for m:regime change is, and how many friends we have now BECAUSE WE ARE RIGHT.
Moving some talk relevant to one user's behaviour to a "flames" page is no big deal, but censoring talk files deliberately that outline such habits as relying on Echo chamber] lies to excuse excluding people you don't like... that is quite relevant to the mission of this wiki. Keep censoring these things, without answering to any of the detailed points, and sadly there may be a need to ask for you to be blocked.
Blocking is for simple vandals. And that's what you appear now to be. - 142