Talk:Governance organization: Difference between revisions
(not wise to try to define this term only as in digital systems) |
(agreed) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Actually this is stupid to restrict the word [[Governance organization]] to refer only to computer systems. Like there are "real world" governance organizations like your government or whatever. | Actually this is stupid to restrict the word [[Governance organization]] to refer only to computer systems. Like there are "real world" governance organizations like your government or whatever. | ||
:Agreed, the Regents of the University of California for instance. Also, governments do sometimes do research and have [[mandatory patent license]]s on it, and agencies to enforce that. The Government of China runs its own [[patent pool]]. So does MIT. | |||
:And, this doesn't refer to only computer systems but all kinds of inventions and properties. So yes generalize what's said here, it was a rush job, I am trying to fix all misunderstood concepts at once so we can make some more rapid progress. | |||
Latest revision as of 21:19, 24 November 2003
Actually this is stupid to restrict the word Governance organization to refer only to computer systems. Like there are "real world" governance organizations like your government or whatever.
- Agreed, the Regents of the University of California for instance. Also, governments do sometimes do research and have mandatory patent licenses on it, and agencies to enforce that. The Government of China runs its own patent pool. So does MIT.
- And, this doesn't refer to only computer systems but all kinds of inventions and properties. So yes generalize what's said here, it was a rush job, I am trying to fix all misunderstood concepts at once so we can make some more rapid progress.