Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in or
create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| '''Wikiism''' is a [[wiki ideology]] that claims that the wiki is not just a technical tool, but is connected to some intrinsic ideology. This is based on the vague idea of "openness for everybody", often connected with some predefined and preexisting ideological background. | | '''Wikiism''' is an [[Ideology]] that claims that the wiki is not just a technical tool, but is connected to some intrinsic ideology. This is based on the vague idea of "openness for everybody" connected with some predefined and preexisting ideological background. |
|
| |
|
| '''Naive Wikiism''' believes that the own worldview will merge seemlessly with wiki power to form a global community that shares the same worldview while the mechanisms of propaganda and constructivism work unchanged for the goals of the background ideology. This puts wiki in the role of a "propaganda tool" and leads to [[Consensual point of view]] wikis primarily. | | '''Naive Wikiism''' believes that the worldview held will merge seemlessly with the power of wiki to form a global community that shares the same worldview while the mechanisms of propaganda and constructivism remain working for the unchanged goals of the background ideology. This primarily leads to wikis holding a [[Consensual point of void]]. |
|
| |
|
| '''Critical Wikiism''' thinks that the simplification of the naive wikiism is unnessary because the new forms of interaction and cooperation will make classical models of ideology, control and propaganda useless. Wiki can cope with all the complexities of multiple opinion systems and will lead to more transparency and new decision processes anyway. This puts wiki in the role of a "reflection tool" and leads to [[Multiple point of view]] wikis primarily. | | '''Critical Wikiism''' thinks that the simplification of the naive wikiism is unnessary because the new forms of interaction and cooperation will make classical modells of ideology, control and propaganda useless. Wiki can cope with all the complexities of multiple opinion systems and will lead to more transparency and new decision processes anyway. This primarily leads to wikis holding a [[Multiple point of void]]. |
| | |
| The overall goal of Wikiism is the proliferation of wikis, especially as a basis for open online communities. Power-hungry sysops and destructive trolls are seen as negative side-effects that should be minimized (together with the intrinsic problem of clique-formation) by an improved collaboration culture.
| |
| | |
| In general wikiists are troll-friendly because they think that
| |
| * (1) the term troll is useless - its only a question of people able to cooperate or not
| |
| * (2) they think that trolls offer unique chances to learn and develop as a community
| |
| * (3) they want their systems to live and share [[controll]] (to not become [[uncontrollable]])
| |
|
| |
|
| See also: | | See also: |
| * [[sysopism]] | | * [[sysopism]] |
| * [[Trollism]] | | * [[Trollism]] |