Search results
Page title matches
- The GodKing is the owner of the site, or its administrator, or any [[sysop]] with ultim ...ssive and limits the quality of participation, since no one wiser than the GodKing will be heeded in its decisions.3 KB (549 words) - 15:47, 24 January 2005
Page text matches
- #REDIRECT [[GodKing]]21 bytes (2 words) - 22:14, 4 June 2004
- The GodKing is the owner of the site, or its administrator, or any [[sysop]] with ultim ...ssive and limits the quality of participation, since no one wiser than the GodKing will be heeded in its decisions.3 KB (549 words) - 15:47, 24 January 2005
- A [[sysop power structure]] with a [[GodKing]] is a good example of this.258 bytes (39 words) - 07:01, 30 March 2004
- ...] which is not [[independent board|independent]], and continue to act as [[GodKing]], while making the others take the heat for stupid decisions.364 bytes (61 words) - 19:54, 17 June 2004
- ...ing any action or making commitments or promises. It is the opposite of [[GodKing]] rule and usually relies on means of [[consensus decision making]].307 bytes (49 words) - 16:11, 26 June 2004
- ''God Save The GodKing'' (sarcastic)561 bytes (88 words) - 06:56, 11 June 2004
- ...the following are caretakers of the Wikipedia project and often defy the [[GodKing]] and other [[usurper]]s to try to keep it "on track" as an encyclopedia: ...y rational fear that some sysops agree with the caretakers more than the [[GodKing]].2 KB (264 words) - 14:45, 14 January 2004
- ...or_antisocial_editors the proposed Wikipedia policy] but without special [[GodKing]] status reserved - as it is in that policy.435 bytes (66 words) - 20:45, 26 January 2005
- ...ipedia, which permits [[outing]] without consequence, and insists on one [[GodKing]] being informed of all details of all decisions, and begging to Him for an542 bytes (84 words) - 03:23, 22 December 2003
- ...at day) they actually mean "we can exclude this without angering our great GodKing." That is ''all'' they mean, that is, there is no possible objective defin2 KB (317 words) - 17:23, 30 June 2004
- ...as [[driven off by trolls|driving off advocates of unfair systems]] and [[GodKing]]s and such.458 bytes (70 words) - 21:26, 1 June 2004
- The "'''usual happy NPOV talk'''" according to [[Jimbo Wales]], [[GodKing]] of [[Wikimedia]], [http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2004-606 bytes (92 words) - 20:56, 16 June 2004
- 2. fascism as a [[sysop power structure]] and perhaps [[GodKing]] take root - some [[sysop vigilantiism]] mostly dealt with informally; so ...ding of [[why wiki works]]; [[usurper]]s have managed to get close to the GodKing personally, and use his approval as a mask to push their own agendas - labe3 KB (474 words) - 20:20, 29 May 2005
- ...ically, and none of this is characteristic of a little tin god sysop, or a GodKing.2 KB (312 words) - 22:13, 4 June 2004
- ...Jimbo") is the co-founder of [[Wikimedia]]. He is sometimes known as the [[Godking]] of wikipedia, or the benevolent dictator. There has been some controversy562 bytes (82 words) - 11:14, 2 October 2004
- *that [[Jim Wales]] is a [[GodKing]] or can be referred to same as if that were harmless829 bytes (132 words) - 22:41, 28 August 2005
- The term was actually coined by Wikipedia's [[GodKing]], "Jimbo" Wales.804 bytes (116 words) - 03:02, 29 May 2004
- ...ot put any one source at the centre of the universe, and strongly oppose [[GodKing]]s on all wikis. This is just one more issue in [[wiki governance]].809 bytes (120 words) - 07:51, 17 June 2004
- '''Ethics''' is whatever a [[GodKing]] says, as interpreted by a [[priestly hierarchy]]. This is [[neutral poin880 bytes (136 words) - 00:07, 10 August 2004
- ...ght be [[driven off by trolls]] if their positions, e.g. pro-Nazi or pro-[[GodKing]], are very unpopular998 bytes (148 words) - 07:34, 8 June 2004