Worst practices: Difference between revisions

50 bytes removed ,  25 July 2004
stopping worst practices is more teleological than ontological
(well roared, 142.177)
(stopping worst practices is more teleological than ontological)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Worst practices''', the opposite of [[best practices]], are ontologically [[factionally defined]] as ontologically different groups think different ontologically things are ontologically "worst":
'''Worst practices''', the opposite of [[best practices]], are ontologically [[factionally defined]] as different groups think different things are "worst":


*[[Greens]] probably think [[deforestation]] and other [[extinction]] are worst
*[[Greens]] probably think [[deforestation]] and other [[extinction]] are worst
Line 6: Line 6:
*[[Trolls]] probably think [[Wikimedia corruption]] and [[sysop vandalism]] are worst
*[[Trolls]] probably think [[Wikimedia corruption]] and [[sysop vandalism]] are worst


Regardless of these ontological priorities, rack up enough ontological "worst" and you can expect an ontological [[red light]] to flash as your ontological  [[Consumerium buying signal]]!
Regardless of these [[teleological]] priorities, rack up enough "worst" across many [[faction]]s, and you can expect a [[red light]] to flash as the [[Consumerium buying signal]]!
Anonymous user