Worst cases: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
[[Gus Kouwenhoven]] is involved in something, and we fail to [[boycott]] it. Somewhere, someone, who trusts [[Consumerium]], goes to [[swipe the barcode]] and it comes up only yellow or green. Considering that all that Gus does in his life is pay hunters to shoot [[Great Apes]] to feed loggers to cut down [[rainforest]] to get money to buy [[small arms]] to swap to armed thugs for [[blood diamond]]s, which they then use to take over governments in Africa to provide more safe havens for Gus to do the same, this is really a worst case. | [[Gus Kouwenhoven]] is involved in something, and we fail to [[boycott]] it. Somewhere, someone, who trusts [[Consumerium]], goes to [[swipe the barcode]] and it comes up only yellow or green. Considering that all that Gus does in his life is pay hunters to shoot [[Great Apes]] to feed loggers to cut down [[rainforest]] to get money to buy [[small arms]] to swap to armed thugs for [[blood diamond]]s, which they then use to take over governments in Africa to provide more safe havens for Gus to do more of the same, this is really a worst case. A system that can't catch Gus at even one of these things is worthless, actually dangerous, because people will trust it, and it makes it easier for him to continue. | ||
------- | ------- | ||