Editing Vandalism

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 3: Line 3:
Sometimes removing critical links and references, big blocks of text, or reverts to material which is not false but perhaps controversial is called vandalism, but this is highly political and subject to much [[systemic bias]] and other [[community point of view]] issues;  There are several cases which each need their own terminology:   
Sometimes removing critical links and references, big blocks of text, or reverts to material which is not false but perhaps controversial is called vandalism, but this is highly political and subject to much [[systemic bias]] and other [[community point of view]] issues;  There are several cases which each need their own terminology:   
*[[Sysop vandalism]] is systematic bias applied and reinforced by the [[sysop power structure]] - it only becomes vandalism when persistent [[ad hominem delete]]s or out of process actions occur, ''e.g. as [[Wikimedia]] authorizes''
*[[Sysop vandalism]] is systematic bias applied and reinforced by the [[sysop power structure]] - it only becomes vandalism when persistent [[ad hominem delete]]s or out of process actions occur, ''e.g. as [[Wikimedia]] authorizes''
*Ordinary [[ad hominem revert]] is sometimes called vandalism, and it is, if and only if errors (not just bias) is restored to user visibility.  It only becomes [[sysop vandalism]] if [[IP block]]s or [[protected page]]s are used to enforce the sysop's view over the non-sysop's view.  ''This is very common in any [[Wikimedia]] forum, and sysops are encouraged to express their own biases.''
*Ordinary [[ad hominem revert]] is sometimes called vandalism, but it only becomes [[sysop vandalism]] if [[IP block]]s or [[protected page]]s are used to enforce the sysop's view over the non-sysop's view.  ''This is very common in any [[Wikimedia]] forum.''
*[[Sysop vigilantiism]] and [[developer vigilantiism]] are power abuses but they are not vandalism.  They are more likely to involve [[libel]] against a person than damage to pages themselves, though they prevent some people contributing.  
*[[Sysop vigilantiism]] and [[developer vigilantiism]] are power abuses but they are not vandalism.  They are more likely to involve [[libel]] against a person than damage to pages themselves, though they prevent some people contributing.


It is a common political tactic to call [[trolls]] "vandals", e.g. as [[Tim Starling]] and [[M. R. M. Parrot]] do, although there is a clear distinction between the two concepts:  one tells a vandal based on what ordinary end users would distinguish about the material;  a troll on the other hand is a person whose view is merely offensive to someone in a [[sysop power structure]];  Both labels are used as simple insults and the use of neither has anything to do with the material's bias or even accuracy necessarily:  calling someone "a troll" is a common [[usurper]] tactic, e.g. employed heavily by [[Auntie Angela]], [[Erik Moeller]], as a prelude to censorshipImportant to realize:
It is a common political tactic to call [[trolls]] "vandals" although there is a clear distinction between the two:  one tells a vandal based on what ordinary end users would distinguish about the material;  a troll on the other hand is a person whose view is merely offensive to someone in a [[sysop power structure]];  Neither has anything to do with the material's accuracy or bias necessarily.  [[Trolling]] and '''vandalism''' are ontological distinctions, not operational ones - one cannot tell they have occurred based on responses or excuses or vigilantiism that they appear to "cause".  It's a social question.
 
[[Trolling]] and '''vandalism''' are ontological distinctions, not operational ones - one cannot tell they have occurred based on responses or excuses or vigilantiism that they appear to "cause".  It's a social question, and thus must be resolved politically, e.g. by [[faction]]s.
 
Highly political [[large public wiki]]s like [[OurAnswer]] are pioneering ways to deal with vandals that do not rely on [[usurper]] cliques as [[Wikimedia]] has.
Please note that all contributions to Consumerium development wiki are considered to be released under the GNU Free Documentation License 1.3 or later (see Consumerium:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)