| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| 30.11.2003
| |
|
| |
| Awww. I've just been lazy today after yesterdays hard work of organizing [[Features]] properly. I guess the next important step I should do is to write [[Preferences]] but I'm not rushing into it since the prefs can be arranged and grouped in several ways and there are possibilities to cause confusion. I've been doing some casual contributions to [[Wiktionary]], which is actually the only way available untill there are more advanced tools available for editors. Trying to systematically cover some areas is really frustrating with the current software.
| |
| ----
| |
| 29.11.2003
| |
|
| |
| Ok. [[Features]] is now has links for each implementable feature and a link to where each feature will likely be implementated. It is also much more compact providing for better browsing experience.
| |
| ----
| |
| 28.11.2003
| |
|
| |
| Today I wrote [[m:Consumerium]] mainly from the point-of-view of [[MediaWiki]] and [[Consumerium]] with appropriate links to this Wiki to briefly describe the considerations we have tackled and future considerations. It is in no way complete and I'll work on it some more bit by bit.
| |
| ----
| |
| 25.11.2003
| |
|
| |
| OK, good, after today's trolling, vandalizing, sysop uppitiness and etc., we have made good progress, and there are now exactly 342 open links in this [[R&D wiki]]. That is remarkably small for the complexity of this problem and what we are trying to change. Please review all 342 at this link:
| |
|
| |
| http://www.consumerium.org/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=Special:Wantedpages&limit=500&offset=0
| |
|
| |
| If there are ''any'' terms that are not '''''obviously''''' well-defined to anyone who knows this [[moral purchasing]] issue well, then, we should make a simple one-paragraph link to explain simply how "what links here" (to that concept) relates to the [[Consumerium buying signal]], and provide an out-link to [[w:Wikipedia]]. PLEASE DON'T put out-links in the text of ANY article - it makes it impossible to find where they are being referenced, and sends readers to Wikipedia by surprise.
| |
|
| |
| After that's done, let's write a bot to go through the remaining open links and just have it create a new page with "An aspect of [[what links here]] and [[what else links here]]... See [[w:name_of_this_article]] for details." That's fine.
| |
|
| |
| I know it's a pain to have 500 short articles that don't add much value, but, they add *some* value (encouraging people to explore common conceptual roots or common dependencies), and they *keep readers here*. There's a reason we don't have more than three or four people in this [[creative network]] - most of our best advertised pages are sending people elsewhere. That's necessary in the beginning when we're trying to educate people.
| |
|
| |
| But now, we need to establish our own slant on as many as 500 concepts that have to be well understood to make this [[healthy buying infrastructure]] [[self-funding]] and unstoppable even by [[Gus Kouwenhoven]] - ah I can spell that now! Making [[Richard Stallman]] happy with it is much harder I think.
| |
|
| |
| --------
| |
|
| |
| 24.11.2003 | | 24.11.2003 |
|
| |
|
| For the very first time, ever, the first hundred or so of the | | For the very first time, ever, all the pages on |
| http://www.consumerium.org/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=Special:Wantedpages | | http://www.consumerium.org/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=Special:Wantedpages |
| have only obvious definitions that can be probably one paragraph with some internal links explaining relevance of the concept to [[Consumerium]] and then just linking off to [[Wikipedia]] or [[Disinfopedia]] or something for greater depth. | | have only obvious definitions that can be probably one paragraph with some internal links explaining relevance of the concept to [[Consumerium]] and then just linking off to [[Wikipedia]] or [[Disinfopedia]] or something for greater depth. |
|
| |
|
| To be exact, all non-obvious terms mentioned on more than 2 pages are now defined at least to draft quality. This is a quite important milestone and it means it's now time to dig through every concept that is uniquely defined here and try to simplify it somewhat, so that people from all those 54 countries with even just [[Simple English]] will start to understand what we are doing.
| | This means that all non-obvious terms mentioned on more than 3 pages are now defined at least to draft quality. This is a quite important milestone and it means it's now time to dig through every concept that is uniquely defined here and try to simplify it somewhat, so that people from all those 54 countries with even just [[Simple English]] will start to understand what we are doing. |
|
| |
|
| There are also incidentally used terms and some whose relevance to Consumerium is not obvious, but, a review of "What links here" for each of them would be of some value in figuring out why they're mentioned. Really we need the following | | There are also incidentally used terms and some whose relevance to Consumerium is not obvious, but, a review of "What links here" for each of them would be of some value in figuring out why they're mentioned. Really we need the following |