Editing User:Jukeboksi/Blog/July2004
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:So [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] needs to exist. | :So [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] needs to exist. | ||
Special thanks to Jimbo for sending numerous emails over the time stating that he is still not planning to sue me for [[libel]]. --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 00:20, 24 Jul 2004 (EEST) | |||
: | :Since [[libel chill]] is his standard method, are you supposed to be grateful? You can't be sued for libel, as what is said is true, anyway. Don't wallow in the mud to that swine Mr. Wales, he has engaged in plenty of real libel himself. We don't allow [[outing]] or [[spun threat]]s here, so the [[worst practices]] just don't happen. | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
::I myself prefer to use http://www.onelook.com which looks up in some 500 dictionaries iirc.--[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 00:20, 24 Jul 2004 (EEST) | ::I myself prefer to use http://www.onelook.com which looks up in some 500 dictionaries iirc.--[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 00:20, 24 Jul 2004 (EEST) | ||
It is better to leave open those pages with obvious meanings, so that we can find a way to figure out what they mean in context from their references later. It is also fine to leave [[Proper Name]]s or companies and people open so that they can eventually be directed to acceptable commentary about them. A few theory terms like [[respect for diversity]] and [[wiki mission]] are so wide open they should be defined more by osmosis, and we should wait as long as we can to do so - preferably using examples from elsewhere. | It is better to leave open those pages with obvious meanings, so that we can find a way to figure out what they mean in context from their references later. It is also fine to leave [[Proper Name]]s or companies and people open so that they can eventually be directed to acceptable commentary about them. A few theory terms like [[respect for diversity]] and [[wiki mission]] are so wide open they should be defined more by osmosis, and we should wait as long as we can to do so - preferably using examples from elsewhere. |