Unsubstantiated claims of Wikimedia corruption: Difference between revisions

Wales' unilateral handling of the China crisis without consulting the Board - classic GodKing fascism and proves beyond a doubt that the WBOT is false front
(amazing! Wikimedia will not release the complete results of its "election" to the "Board" - of course this proves they are fascists)
(Wales' unilateral handling of the China crisis without consulting the Board - classic GodKing fascism and proves beyond a doubt that the WBOT is false front)
Line 2: Line 2:


*withholding [[Wikimedia Board of Trustees]] election results from the voters!  [http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2004-June/000360.html apparently there will be NO release of figures (!), even on a sitewide basis, according to directives by Jimbo] the [[GodKing]] of Wikimedia and [[Bomis]]
*withholding [[Wikimedia Board of Trustees]] election results from the voters!  [http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2004-June/000360.html apparently there will be NO release of figures (!), even on a sitewide basis, according to directives by Jimbo] the [[GodKing]] of Wikimedia and [[Bomis]]
*no [[independent board]] free of influence from [[Bomis.com]]
*no actual end user (as opposed to "developer" or "sysop" or "editor") rep on the "board"
*"Wikimedia Foundation" not consulted when legally important decisions made, e.g. [http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2004-June/000384.html in response to Wikipedia being blocked in China], which is the biggest issue it has ever faced, the [[GodKing]] unilaterally "hereby authorize Andrew Lih to make a statement on our behalf, based on [[usual happy NPOV talk]]."  This was less than one day after the "election" of [[Wikimedia Board of Trustees]] who evidently had no opinion that mattered, on this all-important question.
*false claims added to [[Wikimedia]] article here, and true claims removed
*false claims added to [[Wikimedia]] article here, and true claims removed
*[[technological escalation]] against [[Recyclopedia]] and threatened against [[Wikinfo]]
*[[technological escalation]] against [[Recyclopedia]] and threatened against [[Wikinfo]]
*no [[independent board]] free of influence from [[Bomis.com]]
*"Wikimedia Foundation" not consulted when legally important decisions made
*users not consulted when user environment changes
*users not consulted when user environment changes
*no actual end user (as opposed to "developer" or "sysop" or "editor") rep on the "board"
*[[libel chill]] by Wales
*[[libel chill]] by Wales
*solicitation of donations beyond Florida state lines
*solicitation of donations beyond Florida state lines
Anonymous user