Threats: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
(link brainstorming) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Here are some threats: | Here are some threats: | ||
0. Consumerium suppresses the [[New Troll point of view]], raising [[neutral point of view]] to religion, empowering cliques, and generally making it impossible to challenge anything they say even if it is totally false. In other words, it degrades into [[Wikipedia]]. Even the same people run it, like the [[Mediawiki]] developers and [[Wikimedia]] founders, who have no values worth respecting. | |||
1. Lawyers specializing in [[hot potato]] lawsuits only against the poorest members of the [[Consumerium Governance Organization]], and only for doing things that they really need to do to make [[Consumerium governance]] work. | 1. Lawyers specializing in [[hot potato]] lawsuits only against the poorest members of the [[Consumerium Governance Organization]], and only for doing things that they really need to do to make [[Consumerium governance]] work. | ||
| Line 12: | Line 14: | ||
3. [[Gus Kouwenhoven]] taking over the CGO and steering it "his" way. | 3. [[Gus Kouwenhoven]] taking over the CGO and steering it "his" way. | ||
4. [[Consumerium:itself]] ignores [[comprehensive outcome]] of its advice. All forests disappear and all things on Earth die as a direct result of its use - for instance, in [[Haiti]], the healthy organically grown rice and beans sold via the [[healthy buying infrastructure]], which take more water and longer cooking to prepare, cause the forests disappear since more [[charcoal]] is used. Meanwhile, in [[Congo]], [[ape extinction]] occurs and forests are totally destroyed as miners and loggers wipe out the forest to get [[tantallum]] to meet the [[hardware requirements]]. By ignoring the deepest outcomes of following its advice, Consumerium itself becomes the worst problem. | |||