Editing Test case
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In a [[pilot]], a '''test case''' is one that helps stress the capabilities of the [[Consumerium Process|process]] or [[Consumerium Services|system/services]] that are being tested. These should be selected for maximum controversy and to follow up decisively on [[proof of concept]] [[progress]]: | In a [[pilot]], a '''test case''' is one that helps stress the capabilities of the [[Consumerium Process|process]] or [[Consumerium Services|system/services]] that are being tested. These should be selected for maximum controversy and to follow up decisively on [[proof of concept]] [[progress]]: | ||
*The prototype [[Develop Wiki]] discussion about [[independent board]], [[alleged Wikimedia corruption]], role of [[Bomis]], role of [[perjury]], [[libel chill]], [[groupthink]], actual [[libel]], [[echo chamber]]s, and so on, could be fully developed as a '''case''' of a [[for-profit]] or [[interest group]] exploiting [[non-profit]] status. In the [[Consumerium Research pilot]] such claims would help '''test''' the [[guidelines for | *The prototype [[Develop Wiki]] discussion about [[independent board]], [[alleged Wikimedia corruption]], role of [[Bomis]], role of [[perjury]], [[libel chill]], [[groupthink]], actual [[libel]], [[echo chamber]]s, and so on, could be fully developed as a '''case''' of a [[for-profit]] or [[interest group]] exploiting [[non-profit]] status. In the [[Consumerium Research pilot]] such claims would help '''test''' the [[guidelines for claiming corruption]] and subject them to maximum pressure from expert wiki users of the [[sysop power structure]], those prone to try maximum [[technological escalation]]. Lawsuits based on that would also perhaps help [[self-funding]]. | ||
*The prototype [[Develop Wiki]] discussion about [[Gus Kouwenhoven]], [[Craig Hubley]], [[Fred Bauder]], [[Erik Moeller]] and [[Abe Sokolov]] could easily be developed into a model of what are the reasonable limits of talking about persons in the [[Research Wiki]], and [[guidelines for claims about people]]. | *The prototype [[Develop Wiki]] discussion about [[Gus Kouwenhoven]], [[Craig Hubley]], [[Fred Bauder]], [[Erik Moeller]] and [[Abe Sokolov]] could easily be developed into a model of what are the reasonable limits of talking about persons in the [[Research Wiki]], and [[guidelines for claims about people]]. | ||
*[[Ending Wikimedia]] and forcing [[Bomis]] to disavow itself of any involvement with [[Wikipedia]] would be an excellent '''test case''' that would prove the ability of online scrutiny to eventually force changes to some [[power structure]], even a trivial power structure. Since [[trolls]] already [[driven off by trolls|drove off]] the former [[Chief Editor]] [[Larry Sanger]] it seems entirely reasonable that they could actually drive off Wales as well | *[[Ending Wikimedia]] and forcing [[Bomis]] to disavow itself of any involvement with [[Wikipedia]] would be an excellent '''test case''' that would prove the ability of online scrutiny to eventually force changes to some [[power structure]], even a trivial power structure. Since [[trolls]] already [[driven off by trolls|drove off]] the former [[Chief Editor]] [[Larry Sanger]] it seems entirely reasonable that they could actually drive off Wales as well. | ||