Talk:Worst cases: Difference between revisions

enemy group
(think of it as a security problem - transparent vs. obscure)
(enemy group)
Line 2: Line 2:


:Well, there are two attitudes 1. assume that you are a genius who can figure out all this in advance without ever writing it down or working out weak points "security by obscurity" 2. assume that you need to brainstorm about the problems that can be visited on you in a competitive world, by those who seek to subvert, and, that you can best discourage them by working out a robust solution, wit good answers to all the [[threats]] and [[worst cases]]  You have no non-public way to do this, and surely you would rather be notified of potential attacks or competitors this way than by having them suddenly appear, exploiting flaws in the [[licenses]] and [[audit]] process that you never thought of, or discussed?  Same issue as computer security - you can be transparent or try to hide flaws in the hope that this hiding will make you obscure.  But if it does, you aren't having any influence.  So the winning strategy is probably the more open one.
:Well, there are two attitudes 1. assume that you are a genius who can figure out all this in advance without ever writing it down or working out weak points "security by obscurity" 2. assume that you need to brainstorm about the problems that can be visited on you in a competitive world, by those who seek to subvert, and, that you can best discourage them by working out a robust solution, wit good answers to all the [[threats]] and [[worst cases]]  You have no non-public way to do this, and surely you would rather be notified of potential attacks or competitors this way than by having them suddenly appear, exploiting flaws in the [[licenses]] and [[audit]] process that you never thought of, or discussed?  Same issue as computer security - you can be transparent or try to hide flaws in the hope that this hiding will make you obscure.  But if it does, you aren't having any influence.  So the winning strategy is probably the more open one.
:[http://www.disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=Center_for_Consumer_Freedom Center for Consumer Freedom] is the kind of people we are up against.  They are smart, and well-funded, and you better believe they do this kind of analysis.
Anonymous user