Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in or
create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| [[Cocoa Protocol]] is ''really'' important to this. In fact it should be on [[essential projects]]. It's the ''only'' example of this done in practice. | | [[Cocoa Protocol]] is ''really'' important to this. In fact it should be on [[essential projects]]. It's the ''only'' example of this done in practice. |
|
| |
| :Now as I browsed through the Cocoa Protocol it seems to me to be a commitment to good [[Corporate Citizenship]] by the chocolate industry which is a good thing, but it has nothing to do with [[Work description]]s. I didn't see any informative and well presented description of what kind of work and how much of it goes into chocolate bar, which is what I was after with the article.
| |
|
| |
| ::Agreed, but the language in the Cocoa Protocol is what you must copy to deal with other things. And it ''does'' have work description issues in it, at least basically, because at the root the CP is about eliminating [[w:slavery|slavery]] - something they have negotiated for 140 years!!! It is unlikely we would get better language by starting over from scratch and spending our own 140 years.
| |
|
| |
| ::Also [[ISO 8000]] series is really really important, because it's the [[Corporate citizenship]] standard.
| |