Talk:Wikipedia (from 142 perspective): Difference between revisions

    From Consumerium development wiki R&D Wiki
    (interesting link)
    (whole Red Faction seems to share this perspective, there is no "142 perspective", that's just an IP range)
     
    (20 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
    Line 1: Line 1:
    The entire [[m:]] Meta-Wikipedia is devoted to Talk about Wikipedia.  Please don't do it here!
    #REDIRECT [[Talk:Wikipedia (Reds)]]
     
    --------------
     
    Only issue worth noting is who we don't want coming over here.  It's now getting quite easy to identify who the ideologically motivated censors are:
     
    [http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2004-March/011420.html This account] correctly quotes the [[sysop vandalism|sysop-vandal]] [[w:User:Pakaran]] and the [[w:racism|overt racist]] [[w:User:RickK]] as conspiring to attack and remove views from a contrary POV, that of [[Reds]].
     
    According to that account, "The comments by User:Pakaran
    are merely an example of a broader, overarching pattern; the abuse of users
    who hold unpopular beliefs is practically out in the open now and out of
    control."  [[w:User:Jimbo_Wales]] calls this [[sysop vigilantiism]], though he himself admits an [http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2004-March/011439.html anti-communist viewpoint] probably due to being American and brainwashed by racists and fascists in primary school.
     
    Sokolov's list of racists and fascists engaged in this behaviour include[http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2004-March/011443.html  "Pakaran, RickK, Adam Carr, PMA, Very Verily, Tim Starling, and Robert Merkel"].  Of these [[w:User:Adam_Carr]] seems most egregious to Sokolov/172.  Interesting how this list compares to those listed in the various [[AWR]].  It could not be a coincidence that on a list of ONLY SEVEN USERS, that THREE OF THEM would be also those engaged in ideological censorship earlier, against 142 and others - see [[142.X.X.X/Tim_Starling]] for instance, where Starling basically admits his whole motivation for adding range blocks to [[mediawiki]] is ideological.
     
    http://www.heise.de/newsticker/foren/go.shtml?read=1&msg_id=5032816&forum_id=52498

    Latest revision as of 16:50, 9 September 2004