Talk:Wiki Management: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:
**Developer
**Developer


:::The hierarchy which puts GodKing > Developer > Sysop > User > Anonymous > Trolls is the problem.  It is a simple noxious "[[virtual community]]", i.e. a private domain where decisions are made by "owners" and technocrats who work for "owners".  This is an entirely inappropriate power model for Consumerium.
:::The hierarchy which puts [[GodKing]] > Developer > Sysop > User > Anonymous > [[Trolls]] is the problem.  It is a simple noxious "[[virtual community]]", i.e. a private domain where decisions are made by "owners" and technocrats who work for "owners".  This is an entirely inappropriate power model for Consumerium. It would inevitably lead to corruption and control by owners and promoters of products, starting with technological products.  For these reasons it would be wise to use other [[wiki code]].
 
-------------
Further re: Wikipedia's problems and [[large public wiki]] issues it relates to:


They just don't know what they're doing, and on MeatballWiki and such you can find people complaining about how stupid the Wikipedia people are about how to do real world group management.  They're always the worst example, e.g. of GodKing or just being a libel pit where anyone can lie about anyone else without any consequences.  They'll collapse the day some guy with lawyers notices what they have allowed to be said about him.  Like go look at the Page History of the article on Mel Gibson!!!  And Mel sues, for real... he even sues CHURCHES...
They just don't know what they're doing, and on MeatballWiki and such you can find people complaining about how stupid the Wikipedia people are about how to do real world group management.  They're always the worst example, e.g. of GodKing or just being a libel pit where anyone can lie about anyone else without any consequences.  They'll collapse the day some guy with lawyers notices what they have allowed to be said about him.  Like go look at the Page History of the article on Mel Gibson!!!  And Mel sues, for real... he even sues CHURCHES...
Anonymous user