Talk:Unsubstantiated claims of Wikimedia corruption: Difference between revisions
Talk:Unsubstantiated claims of Wikimedia corruption (edit)
Revision as of 17:56, 19 August 2004
, 19 August 2004ejecting Wales, Mayer, Starling and Moeller - would it help?
No edit summary |
(ejecting Wales, Mayer, Starling and Moeller - would it help?) |
||
| Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
It speaks to the credibility of this page that there is never any response to it except denial and censorship. Lies are told about [[trolls]], and the [[Wikipedia Red Faction]] is censored off the entire net, everywhere, by the [[sysop power structure]] (woops forgot to add that), but no one ever responds substantially to allegations. | It speaks to the credibility of this page that there is never any response to it except denial and censorship. Lies are told about [[trolls]], and the [[Wikipedia Red Faction]] is censored off the entire net, everywhere, by the [[sysop power structure]] (woops forgot to add that), but no one ever responds substantially to allegations. | ||
Question: If [[James Wales]], [[Daniel Mayer]], [[Tim Starling]], [[Erik Moeller]] were all kicked out, would the rest of the project stabilize and solve its corruption problems? Or is fated to be run by the likes of [[Angela Beesley]] and her friends? If so then where will the default [[GFDL corpus access provider]] come from? | |||