Talk:Unsubstantiated claims of Wikimedia corruption: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(are developer payments corrupt?)
No edit summary
Line 74: Line 74:


[http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Developer_payment Developer payment]s are considered corruption by some.  Obviously [[Erik Moeller]] is trying to get paid for doing whatever damage he wants to [[MediaWiki]] with charity money.  It is not clear he will succeed at this damaging and being paid to do damaging.
[http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Developer_payment Developer payment]s are considered corruption by some.  Obviously [[Erik Moeller]] is trying to get paid for doing whatever damage he wants to [[MediaWiki]] with charity money.  It is not clear he will succeed at this damaging and being paid to do damaging.
------------
It speaks to the credibility of this page that there is never any response to it except denial and censorship.  Lies are told about [[trolls]], and the [[Wikipedia Red Faction]] is censored off the entire net, everywhere, by the [[sysop power structure]] (woops forgot to add that), but no one ever responds substantially to allegations.
Anonymous user