Talk:Unsubstantiated claims of Wikimedia corruption: Difference between revisions
Talk:Unsubstantiated claims of Wikimedia corruption (edit)
Revision as of 01:42, 26 July 2004
, 26 July 2004are developer payments corrupt?
(two GFDL violations: no access to current source from some IP numbers, no access to current source of protected pages) |
(are developer payments corrupt?) |
||
| Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
:::This is itself a false claim. Almost all material contributed by the 142 range has remained in the encyclopedia and passed several [[ad hominem delete]] tests - that is, many people agree it belongs. Whatever issues there are with this material, it's not it's lack of encyclopedic relevance. Whenever 142 or similar material is removed, it's almost always [[ad hominem revert]] or [[ad hominem delete]], that is, there is no valid reason to remove it at all, and requiring its removal is simply [[sysop vandalism]]. | :::This is itself a false claim. Almost all material contributed by the 142 range has remained in the encyclopedia and passed several [[ad hominem delete]] tests - that is, many people agree it belongs. Whatever issues there are with this material, it's not it's lack of encyclopedic relevance. Whenever 142 or similar material is removed, it's almost always [[ad hominem revert]] or [[ad hominem delete]], that is, there is no valid reason to remove it at all, and requiring its removal is simply [[sysop vandalism]]. | ||
:::Furthermore, the "vendetta" is beyond anything personal at this point, and includes whole [[faction]]s such as the [[Wikipedia Red Faction]], and even some sympathetic sysops who we do not name so they will not be targetted. | :::Furthermore, the "vendetta" is beyond anything personal at this point, and includes whole [[faction]]s such as the [[Wikipedia Red Faction]], and even some sympathetic sysops who we do not name so they will not be targetted. | ||
----------------- | |||
[http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Developer_payment Developer payment]s are considered corruption by some. Obviously [[Erik Moeller]] is trying to get paid for doing whatever damage he wants to [[MediaWiki]] with charity money. It is not clear he will succeed at this damaging and being paid to do damaging. | |||