Talk:Unsubstantiated claims of Wikimedia corruption: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(responding to the false claim that 142 material is non-encyclopedic: statistically, it sticks as often as any other edits, amazing consider how attacked it is)
No edit summary
Line 53: Line 53:


:This is laughable.  [[Wikipedia]] itself is in constant [[GFDL violation]], and the license does *not* require "links back to the Wikipedia original", it requires access to the source text version of the article, which Wikipedia itself does not provide to all users.
:This is laughable.  [[Wikipedia]] itself is in constant [[GFDL violation]], and the license does *not* require "links back to the Wikipedia original", it requires access to the source text version of the article, which Wikipedia itself does not provide to all users.
::What articles does it not provide the source for? (r3m0t)


:[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Copies_of_Wikipedia_content_(low_degree_of_compliance) here is a list of all the sites they bully and harass into making themselves the centre of the] [[GFDL corpus]] universe.
:[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Copies_of_Wikipedia_content_(low_degree_of_compliance) here is a list of all the sites they bully and harass into making themselves the centre of the] [[GFDL corpus]] universe.


-------------------
-------------------
''the following was added under''
''the following was added under''
*false claims added to [[Wikimedia]] article here, and true claims removed
*false claims added to [[Wikimedia]] article here, and true claims removed
Anonymous user