Editing Talk:UN Human Development Index

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
I'm sure this is an interesting index in some manner, but could you point out some examples how to utilise this information in grading [[product]]s or [[companies]].
I'm sure this is an interesting index in some manner, but could you point out some examples how to utilise this information in grading [[product]]s or [[companies]].


:It's indirect but important.  A [[nation-state]] provides [[human development]] services, the same as [[product]]s are purchased for their [[implied services]], some of which come from the nation-state, e.g. [[food inspection]], [[implied warranty enforcement]], [[mandatory labelling]].  You can't really understand the implication of dealing with a product or company unless you assess how the nation-states involved are supporting them with services.  For instance, expenditures on roads for logging might be understandable in some regions that are very poor, but, you might consider them unthinkable in richer nations.  So position on the Index actually establishes what you will [[forgive]], and it establishes higher standards for those nations that can afford it.  Most directly, products or companies that have interfered with politics in poor countries can be punished if that has led to low positions on the Index.  It all makes sense once you break the [[product]] down to the [[services]] it includes and implies - then the nation-states are just providing more such services, with their own implications.  A [[flag]] is just a [[brand]] for these services...in purchasing you must consider [[flag]], [[brand]] and [[label]] all as implying different services and guarantees, many of which overlap (like if you buy fruit from a country that doesn't allow GMOs even though it has no label guranteeing that).
:It's indirect but important.  A [[nation-state]] provides [[human development]] services, the same as [[product]]s are purchased for their [[implied services]], some of which come from the nation-state, e.g. [[food inspection]], [[implied warranty enforcement]], [[mandatory labelling]].  You can't really understand the implication of dealing with a product or company unless you assess how the nation-states involved are supporting them with services.  For instance, expenditures on roads for logging might be understandable in some regions that are very poor, but, you might consider them unthinkable in richer nations.  So position on the Index actually establishes what you will [[forgive]], and it establishes higher standards for those nations that can afford it.  Most directly, products or companies that have interfered with politics in poor countries can be punished if that has led to low positions on the Index.  It all makes sense once you break the [[product]] down to the [[services]] it includes and implies - then the nation-states are just providing more such services, with their own implications.  A [[flag]] is just a [[brand]] for these services...
in purchasing you must consider [[flag]], [[brand]] and [[label]] all as implying different services and guarantees, many of which overlap (like if you buy fruit from a country that doesn't allow GMOs even though it has no label guranteeing that).
::You are making sense. I have had this trouble of figuring out should if one should [[boycott]] or [[endorsement|endorse]] an product from countries with low living standards. In the long run boycotting might produce and good overall effect, but endorsing might help the shape up the trade/economy (talking poor countries here) and thus the living standards of the people... etc  etc....problem, problem....
::You are making sense. I have had this trouble of figuring out should if one should [[boycott]] or [[endorsement|endorse]] an product from countries with low living standards. In the long run boycotting might produce and good overall effect, but endorsing might help the shape up the trade/economy (talking poor countries here) and thus the living standards of the people... etc  etc....problem, problem....
:::For more on this see [http://textbook.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cookbook Wikipedia (textbook) cookbook].  Note it mentions [[Consumerium]] cooperation, so getting a lot of crossover is very important.  Obviously seeing "grown in Chile" on your grapes is important.
Please note that all contributions to Consumerium development wiki are considered to be released under the GNU Free Documentation License 1.3 or later (see Consumerium:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)