Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in or
create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 4: |
Line 4: |
|
| |
|
| :It can't be one of your [[AWR]] unless you think the [[Wikipedia]] [[GodKing]] makes such rants, and is also a [[142.X.X.X]]. Which is not out of the question. But he invented the word, not us, and he said it happened, not us. | | :It can't be one of your [[AWR]] unless you think the [[Wikipedia]] [[GodKing]] makes such rants, and is also a [[142.X.X.X]]. Which is not out of the question. But he invented the word, not us, and he said it happened, not us. |
|
| |
| -----------
| |
|
| |
| "When we have the situation that some individual is suspected of being
| |
| the reincarnation of a banned user, many, including some sysops start by
| |
| acting on their suspicions rather than seeking out hard evidence. There
| |
| is rarely a need for hasty action when the suspect is confining his
| |
| activities to a handful of articles; there will always be time to fix
| |
| this when the issue is clarified.
| |
|
| |
| ... incessant gnattering about whether someone's edits resemble those of a banned user serves no useful purpose....
| |
|
| |
| There is a serious need for some people to start understanding what
| |
| standards of proof are all about." - [[Ray Saintonge]][http://mail.wikipedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2004-June/013498.html]
| |