Editing Talk:Six Principles

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 6: Line 6:
*[[peace and nonviolence]] through avoiding [[technological escalation]] and use of dirty legalist tactics like [[outing]], [[IP block]]s etc. which only cause fighting.
*[[peace and nonviolence]] through avoiding [[technological escalation]] and use of dirty legalist tactics like [[outing]], [[IP block]]s etc. which only cause fighting.


Maybe more [[respect for diversity]] could be achieved if we had some discussion about the more general application of all the above principles?  Like, what if all [[faction]]s could at least agree to a minimal respect for each of the six?  And is there a seventh?  Like "[[trollism]]"?
Maybe more [[respect for diversity]] could be achieved if we had some discussion about the more general application of all the above principles?  Like, what if all [[faction]]s could at least agree to a minimal respect for each of the six?  And is there a seventh?
Please note that all contributions to Consumerium development wiki are considered to be released under the GNU Free Documentation License 1.3 or later (see Consumerium:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)
Return to "Six Principles" page.