Editing Talk:Research:claim corruption
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Suggest standard: To [[Research:claim corruption]] is a [[verb phrase]] describing what a user might want to do in one click as a [[command verb]], but [[claims of corruption]] is a [[noun phrase]] for the result). | Suggest standard: To [[Research:claim corruption]] is a [[verb phrase]] describing what a user might want to do in one click as a [[command verb]], but [[claims of corruption]] is a [[noun phrase]] for the result). | ||
It may also be time to stop carrying on a dialogue in the [[page history]] that will make little sense later on when [[alleged Wikimedia corruption]] is proven true and [[end Wikimedia|this nonsense is all over]].Β AT that time, sticking up for them and against the analysis of [[Wikipedia ( | It may also be time to stop carrying on a dialogue in the [[page history]] that will make little sense later on when [[alleged Wikimedia corruption]] is proven true and [[end Wikimedia|this nonsense is all over]].Β AT that time, sticking up for them and against the analysis of [[Wikipedia (Richard Chilton)]] will appear very foolish. | ||