Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in or
create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 2: |
Line 2: |
|
| |
|
| Time to figure out how the [[Consumerium buying signal]] is actually approved. | | Time to figure out how the [[Consumerium buying signal]] is actually approved. |
|
| |
| [http://test.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Main_Page&action=validate×tamp=20040810005530 Here's] an interesting piece of code developed by [[Magnus Manske]], unused on [[Wikipedia]] but maybe useful for the [[Consumerium Process]]. It allows users to flag some article as validated on a number of issues ie. ''style, legal, completeness, facts, suitability for "final" release'' in the [[Publish Wiki]].
| |
|
| |
| Its use for custom meta-tags such as "no index", or [[faction tag]]s may let us easily and reliably control what gets indexed by search engines. This might make it possible to unify [[Research Wiki]] and [[Publish Wiki]] where articles flagged indexable would be considered "published" and those with "no index" to be still in research stage. With all of the [[faction tag]]s the undisputed [[gnawlij]] could immediately become the [[Consumerium buying signal]].
| |
|
| |
| [[User:Juxo]] also reports:
| |
| "Apparently Magnuses' code does not include tags for robots but according to [[Tim Starling]] this would not be difficult to implement. The main problem being that once an article is indexed and then some seedy characters add questionable content how does one get Google etc. to stop indexing it. Apparently there is yet no way to remove pages from search engines on request."
| |