Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in or
create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| a sort of a troll fighting against standardization... | | a sort of a troll fighting against standardization... |
| : why, then't there any trolls fighting *for* standardization?
| |
| :: in fact if you are, then you are engaged in [[extreme standard]]s
| |
| ----
| |
| Shouldn't this article be in [[Wikipedia]]. This isn't really relevant to our [[Consumerium:FAQ|goal]]
| |
|
| |
| :We should have a minimum definition here, since for [[Consumerium]] we care about [[label]]s and thus [[standard]]s, consider variance in types of [http://www.internet-encyclopedia.info/wiki.phtml?title=Truth Truth (IE version)] and [http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=Point_of_view point of view (from the propagandists)], his story can be told in a way relevant to that. For instance the variation in [[ecoregion]]s should lead to different standards. So P for you in his own ecoregion is fair, but him coming to yours is not, he with his KitKat McFlurry!
| |
|
| |
| ----
| |
|
| |
| Well...I did not mention it was also a kamasutra position, which "would" have been irrelevant here...
| |
|
| |
| But...I had the feeling it was relevant here, as I believe one of the threat a consumer is meeting is the attempt to reduce him/her to one standard.
| |
|
| |
| :[[Homogenity]] is very good for the [[capitalist]] [[market economy]], since everybody will [[work]]/[[consume]] much harder to gain some difference from the rest of the people, if everyone desires the same things. [[Heterogenity]] on the other hand is better for the [[planet]] since people don't have to strive so much to feel oneself as an individual, thus reducing the [[ecological]] strain caused by people.
| |
|
| |
| Such as most food portions being adapted to a family of four. Or directing a whole population to eat one product rather than a variety, or for everyone to eat more salty than before to increase drinks sales. To feed everyone with Mac Donald, even if that require small adaptations depending on countries. hum
| |
|
| |
| :HumHum. The consumers get what they want or they get what the marketing people believe the consumers could be tricked to believe to want. No?
| |
|
| |
| ::Very true. Now, if you are single, marketing people will have a tough time convincing one, that he wants to eat the same dinner four days in a row. Okay, my potatoes are cooked.
| |
|
| |
| -------
| |
|
| |
| Trolls consider this relevant, metaphorically, like [[world tree]].
| |
|
| |
| There are only a half dozen or so of such concepts. But this is one.
| |