Talk:Faction: Difference between revisions
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (2010) HDTV...
No edit summary |
(Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (2010) HDTV...) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
------ | ------ | ||
[http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2004-March/011443.html | [[Abe Sokolov]] [http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2004-March/011443.html on the wikien-l list] writes: | ||
:"The "[[Reds|red]] [[faction]]" isn't a [[vandalism]] problem, but an example of mutual misperception and misjudgment breeding conflict and hostility. On a more practical note, the persistence of the "red faction" in regenerating itself over and over again (almost like Lir and his many incarnations) makes it clear that banning this user, or [[driven off by trolls|attempting to chase him away and make him feel unwelcome]], are crude, self-defeating solutions. Since the Wiki mailing list is libertarian country, I'll say that it's like slapping on price controls to curb inflation. Or perhaps putting a bandage on a leaking dam. In other words, it's an unworkable straitjacket that will only confound the problem." | :"The "[[Reds|red]] [[faction]]" isn't a [[vandalism]] problem, but an example of mutual misperception and misjudgment breeding conflict and hostility. On a more practical note, the persistence of the "red faction" in regenerating itself over and over again (almost like Lir and his many incarnations) makes it clear that banning this user, or [[driven off by trolls|attempting to chase him away and make him feel unwelcome]], are crude, self-defeating solutions. Since the Wiki mailing list is libertarian country, I'll say that it's like slapping on price controls to curb inflation. Or perhaps putting a bandage on a leaking dam. In other words, it's an unworkable straitjacket that will only confound the problem." | ||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
Also re: [[Wikipedia Red Faction]] is [[Daniel Mayer]]'s comment "Wikipedia breaking up into factions is a very, very bad idea." [http://mail.wikipedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2004-June/013471.html] This should prove to all espousing the [[New Troll point of view]] that it is in fact a very ''good'' idea, as Mayer is the most notorious [[sysop vandalism]] advocate and the source of most [[Wikimedia corruption]] according to some. | Also re: [[Wikipedia Red Faction]] is [[Daniel Mayer]]'s comment "Wikipedia breaking up into factions is a very, very bad idea." [http://mail.wikipedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2004-June/013471.html] This should prove to all espousing the [[New Troll point of view]] that it is in fact a very ''good'' idea, as Mayer is the most notorious [[sysop vandalism]] advocate and the source of most [[Wikimedia corruption]] according to some. | ||
------------ | |||
Timing: when do we have to block IP of our first non-simple vandal? Liar, bully, bigot, paid provocateur? That's when we have to make decisions: | |||
*Issue: figuring out what these "bad things" mean is controversial, and seems to label people rather than behaviour or specific incidents or posts | |||
**position: Assigning labels to individuals is damaging to creative discussion | |||
***argument: Not every post is associated with an "individual", and no individual leads their whole life online, and certainly not in this forum - there are some forms of creative discussion that simply belong somewhere else | |||
**position: Assigning labels to individuals happens anyway: [[Vandals]] and [[Trolls]] get named that by other people. Or get called "anti-Semite" or "thug" or "liar" or something. There is no clear way for them to adopt any other more accurate or expressive label. | |||
***argument: a '''faction''' lets someone be labelled, but it also lets them change that label, and decide who they see themselves as accountable to, where [[social inclusion]] is at issue | |||
*Issue: the roles of factions in simplifying and focusing common arguments | |||
**position: Self-applying labels so as to identify with a faction that holds a well defined viewpoint is productive, as it saves time re-explaining well defined concepts | |||
***argument: we've seen a lot of the arguments before; many are well worn and arise due to various differences in life experience and economic interests that are really hard to eliminate, and certainly won't be settled online here. | |||
***argument: if we allow someone to identify the predictable and imitative part of their argument, that makes the creative and original part stand out, and it helps them identify whether better rhetoric or evidence already exists that would make it easier for them to make the same point - but that's up to them | |||
**position: Identifying factions allows them to claim viewpoints as factional, so protecting them from [[sysop vandalism]] | |||
***argument: this seems to be the default anyway as people gang up to resist [[ad hominem revert]]s - over time, people will notice that certain people who say what they think are reasonable things are reverted more often than others who say what they think are less reasonable things, and that will form factions whether they are acknowledged or not. | |||
****evidence: multi-party [[representative democracy]] evolved in every country that tried to start with [[direct democracy]] or [[participatory democracy]]; it therefore must be assumed to solve some essential problems | |||
*Issue: [[factionally defined]] terms are often specifically chosen to created [[forced conjunction]] or deny the importance of major distinctions the "other side" sees as crucial, like denying "choice" or "life" as values in the [[abortion]] debate by trying to get neutrals to use a label which puts the emphasis on one or the other | |||
**position: forcing all factions to agree on neutral titles is one of the great successes of [[neutral point of view]]. Neutral titles are good policy and make it much easier to find [[troll bridge]]s. | |||
**position: [[Consumerium:Itself]] can't expect to do any better than the people who devote their lives to [[dispute resolution]] and policy debate in the real world. For instance, you can't expect to achieve more agreement on what global [[sustainable industries]] are than say [[Green Party policy]] would reflect already - if they, who care about it and believe in it the most, can't exactly define it, then, it's irrational to believe that [[Consumerium:We]] can. | |||
***argument: this terminology is weak, because the subject matter is new and difficult | |||
****evidence: the difficulty of even just getting all [[Green Party policy]] and [[greenspeak]] in one place and up to date has prevented it from happening so far! | |||
**position: If [[Green Party policy]] really does help unify Green Party policy, then [[Greens]] at least could claim to "know how to do this" advancing of terminology. They can then try convincing everyone else to use [[greenspeak]] at least when talking about economics and industries. ONLY WHEN THAT WORKS CAN THEY CLAIM TO HAVE ANY EXPERTISE HERE. | |||
***argument: this is actually one of the EASIER problems in factionally defined terms, since Greens take so much terminology from well known fields - they use terms from the [[w:list of ecology topics]], [[w:list of ethics topics]] as is, whereas other factions typically try to just invent their own. | |||
== Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (2010) HDTV.. == | |||
Download Free Best Films HD in the World. | |||
<a href=http://cheap-junior-clothing-online.zanjatno.pp.ua/>Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (2010) HDTV</a> | |||
<a href=http://2006-films.zanjatno.pp.ua/><img>http://kino-manija.ru/images/stories/films_1/harry-potter-and-the-deathly-hallows%201.jpg</img></a> | |||
<a href=http://actor-was-a-truck-driver.zanjatno.pp.ua/>actor was a truck driver</a> | |||
<a href=http://best-dvd-decoder-for-wma.zanjatno.pp.ua/>best dvd decoder for wma</a> | |||
<a href=http://cinema-organ-societ-uk.zanjatno.pp.ua/>cinema organ societ uk</a> | |||
<a href=http://flat-musical-note.zanjatno.pp.ua/>flat musical note</a> | |||
<a href=http://free-final-fantsay-sex-pics.zanjatno.pp.ua/>free final fantsay sex pics</a> | |||
== Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (2010) HDTV... == | |||
Download Free Best Films HD in the World. | |||
<a href=http://blackberry-bold-web-downloads.zanjatie.pp.ua/>Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (2010) HDTV</a> | |||
<a href=http://free-beach-bikini-photos.zanjatie.pp.ua/><img>http://kino-manija.ru/images/stories/films_1/harry-potter-and-the-deathly-hallows%201.jpg</img></a> | |||
<a href=http://cinema-llanelli.zanjatie.pp.ua/>cinema llanelli</a> bow hunting dvd | |||
<a href=http://free-csi-video-game.zanjatie.pp.ua/>free csi video game</a> double your vertical leap download | |||
<a href=http://free-japenese-handjob-videos.zanjatie.pp.ua/>free japenese handjob videos</a> free convert a to | |||
<a href=http://dream-big-youtube-full.zanjatie.pp.ua/>dream big youtube full</a> free horse applique designs | |||
<a href=http://busch-series-race-car-drivers.zanjatie.pp.ua/>busch series race car drivers</a> asian tentacle video links | |||
http://abs-of-steel-download.zanjatie.pp.ua/ free draw software | |||
http://free-ebook-search-engine.zanjatie.pp.ua/ dance instruction video hip hop | |||
http://denon-sys-76ht-review.zanjatie.pp.ua/ download picasa2 | |||
http://distance-education-q-online-cou.zanjatie.pp.ua/ case western physician list | |||
http://car-shows-oct-2007.zanjatie.pp.ua/ copy rolex automatic watch parts | |||