Editing Talk:Creative network
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Note: [[w:User:Angela]] deliberately deleted the article referenced as part of a vast [[ad hominem delete]] that has rendered the Simple English Wikipedia an [[enemy project]]. This [[sysop vandalism]] is a direct attack on the purposes of [[Consumerium]] which required good definitions that it did not have to write itself, but now has to... this is one of many reasons Angela was [[driven off by trolls]] today, and will be driven off again and again until she goes away permanently. It is also the reason for the coming troll attacks at [[Simple English Wikipedia]] that will make it more or less useless for any purpose, and certainly an unpleasant project to work on, as all [[enemy projects]] soon will be. | |||
Permitting 'linguistic inferiors' to discuss creative or contact networks, but not social or power networks, is typical of the imperialist mind-set | :Nonsense. The article is still there and was never deleted. [[User:Angela|Angela]] 06:46, 13 Jan 2004 (EET) | ||
::So it is. Apologies for the error. It is very interesting that the ideas of a [[creative network]] and [[contact network]] prove politically correct for your purposes, and [[social network]] and [[power network]] do not. While you look less like a vandal, you look more like a power grabber and imperialist all the time, "Angela". Slowly, your agenda is revealed... | |||
::Permitting 'linguistic inferiors' to discuss creative or contact networks, but not social or power networks, is typical of the imperialist mind-set | |||