Editing Talk:Content Wiki
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I guess the rational approach to figuring the '''syntax''' for articles would be to go over the [[features]] and see how they could be expressed in [[Wiki]] without losing the possibility to do automated assesments over several articles to provide statistics. Sure there can be conventions on general wording. Example: | |||
<nowiki>Product [[Product:Product Y|]] identified by [[GTIN:SomeGTINString|]] | |||
belongs to groups [[ProductGroup:A|]] and [[ProductGroup:B|]] and | |||
is produced by [[Company:Company X|]]</nowiki> <br> | |||
and so forth but the problem arising is how this scales with the goal of Consumerium functioning in all major languages. | |||
Also [[ConsuML]] development should not cease totally, but be more of an compliment to the Wiki front. | |||
I wonder how could it be possible to sort of "melt" together Wiki and XML systems so that the Wiki provides ease of editing and the XML provides rigidness and longevity. I have nothing concrete on this issue but I'll keep on thinking about it | |||
:Just came to my mind that a hybrid model where part of the article is generated from [[ConsuML]] data and the rest is pure wiki might be the most robust solution for content. | |||