Talk:Contact network: Difference between revisions

    From Consumerium development wiki R&D Wiki
    (detail right, principle wrong)
    (restoring all that matters to those confused by deliberate censorship at "Simple English Wikipedia" and open links created thereby)
     
    (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
    Line 1: Line 1:
    Note:  [[w:User:Angela]] deliberately deleted the article referenced as part of a vast [[ad hominem delete]] that has rendered the Simple English Wikipedia an [[enemy project]].  This [[sysop vandalism]] is a direct attack on the purposes of [[Consumerium]] which required good definitions that it did not have to write itself, but now has to... this is one of many reasons Angela was [[driven off by trolls]] today, and will be driven off again and again until she goes away permanently.  It is also the reason for the coming troll attacks at [[Simple English Wikipedia]] that will make it more or less useless for any purpose, and certainly an unpleasant project to work on, as all [[enemy projects]] soon will be.
    This article's main references, to [[social network]] and [[power network]], both non-controversial terms from sociology that are absolutely required to allow people with only Simple English to participate in the [[power structure]], were deleted. The article isn't of much use without these


    :Nonsense. The article is still there and was never deleted. [[User:Angela|Angela]] 06:45, 13 Jan 2004 (EET)
      The SEW remains an unsuitable and unreliable reference for those who are actually trying to create a multi-lingual cooperative project that would not rely on American/English POV and culture, or would explain what it means neutrally.
     
    ::The article's main references, to [[social network]] and [[power network]], both non-controversial terms from sociology that are absolutely required to allow people with only Simple English to participate in the [[power structure]], were deleted.  The article isn't of much use without these, and, although you are correct on the detail (possibly we checked at a time when the new software hadn't moved all the articles over) you are wrong on principle, as usual. The SEW remains an unsuitable and unreliable reference for those who are actually trying to create a multi-lingual cooperative project that would not rely on American/English POV and culture, or would explain what it means neutrally.

    Latest revision as of 21:12, 10 February 2004

    This article's main references, to social network and power network, both non-controversial terms from sociology that are absolutely required to allow people with only Simple English to participate in the power structure, were deleted. The article isn't of much use without these

    The SEW remains an unsuitable and unreliable reference for those who are actually trying to create a multi-lingual cooperative project that would not rely on American/English POV and culture, or would explain what it means neutrally.