Talk:Categories: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
(wait! must discuss and design categories, else get into a horror) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
------- | ------- | ||
This is the current list [[Special:categories]] returns. | This is the current list [[Special:categories]] returns. A few of them are bad names: | ||
1. Cell Phones | 1. Cell Phones | ||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
:Are these different? Possibly, but maybe just a category [[wiki]] alone is enough | :Are these different? Possibly, but maybe just a category [[wiki]] alone is enough | ||
Humor | |||
:That's subjective. To [[fund Consumerium]] for instance may have a humorous version from [[NTPOV]] and many "serious" versions, it's a bad idea to categorize whole pages based on some content that will be seen seriously by some and not by others. Better to say "funny" since something can be both serious and funny, but what is "humor" is too easily dismissed; "Humor" describes intent, while "funny" describes a page attribute - the latter is far more neutral. | |||
[[Bad page name]] | |||
:A critical category. | |||