Editing Talk:Brand management

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Brand management''' is the exploitation of positive [[repute]] and association of one's [[service]]s with [[good thing]]s, thus making it appear as a [[good thing]], regardless of its actual [[comprehensive outcome]]. Thus, it is a [[bad thing]], and one [[Consumerium Services]] seeks to undo.
'''Brand management''' is the exploitation of positive [[repute]] and association of one's [[service]]s with [[good thing]]s, thus making it appear as a [[good thing]], regardless of its actual [[comprehensive outcome]]. Thus, it is a [[bad thing]], and one [[Consumerium Services]] seeks to undo.
:This is non-sense. [[Consumerium Services]] can also be used to enhance the [[repute]] a [[brand]] for example if it has a good history of [[Workplace Upgrade]]s.
:This is non-sense. [[Consumerium Services]] can also be used to enhance the [[repute]] a [[brand]] for example if it has a good history of [[Workplace Upgrade]]s.
::No, that is an abuse and such a use would make you a [[usurper]] if you did not also consider other elements of its [[comprehensive outcome]].  A paradise workplace in a company mining [[tantallum]] or making [[charcoal]] is not good enough, and any [[brand management]] of this kind would simply be destructive:  "gee look at the monkey, we pay our workers more and improved their health, but what they do is still destroying the entire planet and wiping out our nearest relatives."  This proves the point.


:No point in fighting over the fact that there are numerous people working in [[Brand management]] working hard to make it look good through [[advertising]] and pr-stunts or real [[charitable contribution]]s --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 22:45, 9 Mar 2004 (EET)
:No point in fighting over the fact that there are numerous people working in [[Brand management]] working hard to make it look good through [[advertising]] and pr-stunts or real [[charitable contribution]]s --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 22:45, 9 Mar 2004 (EET)
::Know thy enemy.  We must investigate this question very critically, as it ties closely to the question of negative vs. positive [[repute]] and whether positive repute is just dangerous.  Consider the [[dissuade reputation]] arguments they make over at [[MeatballWiki]] for instance, or the [[trolls]]' anonymity focus.  There are reasons for these policies.
Please note that all contributions to Consumerium development wiki are considered to be released under the GNU Free Documentation License 1.3 or later (see Consumerium:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)
Retrieved from "https://develop.consumerium.org/wiki/Talk:Brand_management"