Editing Talk:Anti-authoritarianism in practice

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
To even imagine that the [[trolled]] content of [[Recyclopedia]] was somehow not directly relevant to its avowed mission is stupid.  Do not imagine it.  It was the insincere [[Sysop Vandal point of view]] and mindless kowtowing even to [[denial of service attack]] that killed that project, not irrelevant content.
To even imagine that the [[trolled]] content of [[Recyclopedia]] was somehow not directly relevant to its avowed mission is stupid.  Do not imagine it.  It was the insincere [[Sysop Vandal point of view]] and mindless kowtowing even to [[denial of service attack]] that killed that project, not irrelevant content.
Obviously [[Consumerium Services]] could much more easily support [[Distributed Consumerium]] if they were organized anarchistically to begin with.  Hmm... So maybe we need all of these principles defined and how Consumerium implements them laid out as a proposal?
Please note that all contributions to Consumerium development wiki are considered to be released under the GNU Free Documentation License 1.3 or later (see Consumerium:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)