Simple Trollish: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[m:List_of_articles_all_languages_should_have| | Some people have trouble understanding [[trollish]]. The [[Meta-Wikipedia]]'s [[m:List_of_articles_all_languages_should_have|list of articles all languages should have]] includes the following required to understand "philosophy": | ||
*[[scientific method]] | *[[scientific method]] - ''which trolls improve to [[scienterrific myehod]]'' | ||
*[[knowledge]] | *[[knowledge]] - ''which trolls [[gnaw]] down into [[gnawlij]] of [[some body]]'' | ||
*[[truth]] | *[[truth]] - ''which trolls [[defer]] to the [[world tree]]'' | ||
*[[neutral point of view]] | *[[neutral point of view]] - ''see [[New Troll point of view]]'' | ||
*[[ethics]] | *[[ethics]] - ''see [[moral order]]'' | ||
*[[politics]] | *[[politics]] - ''see [[politics as usual]]'' | ||
*[[ontology]] | *[[ontology]] - ''see [[some body]] versus [[no body]]'' | ||
*[[consensus decision making]] | *[[consensus decision making]] - ''see [[gnawing]]'' | ||
*[[trolling]] | *[[trolling]] - ''see [[heroic trolling]] and [[magnificent trolling]]'' | ||
Accordingly, a '''Simple Trollish''' encyclopedia must explain all of these | Accordingly, a '''Simple Trollish''' encyclopedia must explain all of these and their trollish equivalents. [[Consumerium]] defines the above from a [[New Troll point of view]] - a much more accurate way to view these things than a "philosophy" could ever be. | ||
''ok, you are right, [[trolling]] was not listed, but | ''ok, you are right, [[trolling]] was not listed, but [[philosophy as usual]] is just a form of trolling really, so it should be there!'' | ||