Editing One-party state
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''One-party state''' is a euphemism for dictatorship. Although the [[People's Republic of China]] is officially a [[political party|multi-party]] state, with a Peasant's Party, it is in fact subordinate to the Communist Party. Also, the [[Wikimedia]] "Board of Trustees" consists of three members who are co-owners of bomis.com, one of whom is '''dictator for life''', and two others who are "elected" from the "Wikipedians" and no doubt easily removed by the three. This too is a one-party state, which claims to represent a [[consensus]], but has no checks on that other than its own opinions. | '''One-party state''' is a euphemism for dictatorship. Although the [[People's Republic of China]] is officially a [[political party|multi-party]] state, with a Peasant's Party, it is in fact subordinate to the Communist Party. Also, the [[Wikimedia]] "Board of Trustees" consists of three members who are co-owners of bomis.com, one of whom is '''dictator for life''', and two others who are "elected" from the "Wikipedians" and no doubt easily removed by the three. This too is a one-party state, which claims to represent a [[consensus]], but has no checks on that other than its own opinions. | ||
See [[two-party | See [[two-party state]] for the more sophisticated phase that the real USA is in, and [[faction]] for a general model of [[political consumerism]] and the management of views in the [[Research Wiki]]. |