Editing Mobile device vendor

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 2: Line 2:


Typically it is not the device vendors but the [[network operator]] and [[service provider]] (in Internet, these are different entities, but [[common carrier]]s in telecom are almost always both, monopolizing services that are on "their" networks, like old fashioned online services prior to the Web).
Typically it is not the device vendors but the [[network operator]] and [[service provider]] (in Internet, these are different entities, but [[common carrier]]s in telecom are almost always both, monopolizing services that are on "their" networks, like old fashioned online services prior to the Web).
Device vendor [[consortia]] have typically failed to require the carriers to implement key features, such as [[PCS base station handoff]] and [[open switch]] access.Β  These are supported in standards but cannot be deployed due to carrier monopoly.


In general, the mobile device vendor is an ally, and the telecom common carrier is an opponent, in implementing a [[healthy buying infrastructure]].Β  However, paradoxically, because they profit more from frequent turnover of new devices, the vendor is probably an opponent of [[healthy signal infrastructure]] and the longer lifecycle of more modular devices, while the carrier may actually favour it, because it simplifies and standardizes the devices that they must deal with.
In general, the mobile device vendor is an ally, and the telecom common carrier is an opponent, in implementing a [[healthy buying infrastructure]].Β  However, paradoxically, because they profit more from frequent turnover of new devices, the vendor is probably an opponent of [[healthy signal infrastructure]] and the longer lifecycle of more modular devices, while the carrier may actually favour it, because it simplifies and standardizes the devices that they must deal with.
Please note that all contributions to Consumerium development wiki are considered to be released under the GNU Free Documentation License 1.3 or later (see Consumerium:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)