Editing Lifecycle assessment

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 4: Line 4:


Materials choice is a critical element of LCA.  For example, the ISO 14000 version of LCA in its strongest form would forbid making a key from [[aluminum]] because each use of it generates aluminum oxide which is toxic.  Making it from brass or steel instead has no such effects.
Materials choice is a critical element of LCA.  For example, the ISO 14000 version of LCA in its strongest form would forbid making a key from [[aluminum]] because each use of it generates aluminum oxide which is toxic.  Making it from brass or steel instead has no such effects.
The problem in relying on ISO standards to make Lifecycle assesments is that these ISO standards for '''quality of a process''' are issued by certifiers who charge a lot of money for issuing the certificate, thus making aquiring one prohibitively expensive for small companies.
Please note that all contributions to Consumerium development wiki are considered to be released under the GNU Free Documentation License 1.3 or later (see Consumerium:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)