Editing Integrity
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Integrity''' is like [[trust]]: if you have | '''Integrity''' is like [[trust]]: if you have about it, it isn't there. So like [[distrust]], which is predictable lack of trust, e.g. [[checks and balances]], there is [[disintegrity]], consistent testing to find lack of integrity. | ||
[[Consumerium]] can expect to face at least the following challenges to its integrity: | [[Consumerium]] can expect to face at least the following challenges to its integrity: | ||
*accusations of [[m:bias|bias]] and [http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=systemic_bias systemic bias] | *accusations of [[m:bias|bias]] and [http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=systemic_bias systemic bias] | ||
*plain [[m:liars |liars]] especially those who hide evidence of their lies | *plain [[m:liars |liars]] especially those who hide evidence of their lies | ||
*[[m:Internet Authority Disease|Internet Authority Disease]] ([[misintegrity]]) | *[[m:Internet Authority Disease|Internet Authority Disease]] ([[misintegrity]]) | ||
**[http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=little_tin_god_sysop bad sysops] (those who cannot rise to [[m:troll| | **[http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=little_tin_god_sysop bad sysops] (those who cannot rise to [[m:troll|troll]]) | ||
**[[w:precedent|precedent]] - using one bad decision to justify the next one | **[[w:precedent|precedent]] - using one bad decision to justify the next one | ||
**[[w:groupthink|groupthink]] - trying to agree with each other, sysop, leader | **[[w:groupthink|groupthink]] - trying to agree with each other, sysop, leader | ||
*[http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=point_of_view POV problems] like silly [http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=Wikipedia_neutral_point_of_view Wikipedia neutral point of view] | *[http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=point_of_view POV problems] like silly [http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=Wikipedia_neutral_point_of_view Wikipedia neutral point of view] | ||
*[http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=propaganda propaganda] and well-meaning [http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=propaganda_techniques propaganda techniques] that discredit us | *[http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=propaganda propaganda] and well-meaning [http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=propaganda_techniques propaganda techniques] that discredit us | ||
*claims that the [[glossary]] is not a [[m:natural point of view|valid, natural, point of view]] | *claims that the [[glossary]] is not a [[m:natural point of view|valid, natural, point of view]] | ||
*accusations that its use of [[electronics]] just leads to more [[e-waste]], that is, it is another [[geek]] site with only purpose being silly | |||
[http://disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=virtual_community virtual community], that is, friends for geeks who deserve none, and doesn't do any real [[good]] or stop any real [[evil]] | |||
How it deals with these challenges will determine if it is trusted for anything else. | How it deals with these challenges will determine if it is trusted for anything else. | ||