Editing GFDL violation

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 6: Line 6:


Other types of GFDL violations include:
Other types of GFDL violations include:
*failing to credit the top five contributors when a document is exported via XML - ''this is quite difficult to do without an [[interwiki identity standard]]''
*failing to credit the top five contributors when a document is exported via XML - ''this is quite diificult to do without a [[wiki identity standard]]''
*failing to permit retrieval of any page's source text, even to [[trolls]]
*failing to permit retrieval of any page's source text, even to [[trolls]]
*failing to respect the status of [[Secondary Section]]s and [[Invariant Section]]s or respect the obligations implied by the latter
*failing to respect the status of [[Secondary Section]]s and [[Invariant Section]]s or respect the obligations implied by the latter
[[Wikipedia]] has complicated matters with its policy of forcing other [[GFDL corpus access provider]]s to provide links to itself if any text is similar to any other GFDL text that has been published via [[Wikipedia]] (which legally and technically is only a user interface).  While it is the largest and best known source, it is deliberately NOT the authoratitive or most quotable source for any particular topic.  Accordingly it is seriously detrimental to the [[GFDL corpus]] to have all links on all topics lead to Wikipedia.  The license implies that the best and most authoritative version be linked to, not just the first place where the material appeared.


[http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=16551 The Inquirer] ran an article on this which asked for [mailto:fcassia@sdf.lonestar.org email regarding violations].
[http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=16551 The Inquirer] ran an article on this which asked for [mailto:fcassia@sdf.lonestar.org email regarding violations].
Please note that all contributions to Consumerium development wiki are considered to be released under the GNU Free Documentation License 1.3 or later (see Consumerium:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)