Editing Content Wiki
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==What is the Content Wiki?== | ==What is the Content Wiki?== | ||
Content Wiki is where '''facts''' on [[product]]s and [[companies]] and such will be stored when it gets built | Content Wiki is where '''facts''' on [[product]]s and [[companies]] and such will be stored when it gets built. | ||
'''Opinions''' (ie. [[Campaign]]s and split articles) go to [[Opinion Wiki]] when it gets built. | |||
This page is not for actual [[features|content]] but for developing the syntax and governance of the Content Wiki so we can set one up. | |||
---- | ---- | ||
==Wiki software | ==Wiki software== | ||
To | To fork or not to fork that is the question. It is natural to presume that the wiki softare will be either: | ||
#[[MediaWiki]] unmodified | #[[MediaWiki]] unmodified | ||
#'''[[MediaWiki modifications|MediaWiki modified]]''' | #'''[[MediaWiki modifications|MediaWiki modified]]''' | ||
# | #A fork of MediaWiki | ||
#[[TikiWiki]] unmodified | #[[TikiWiki]] unmodified | ||
#TikiWiki modified | #TikiWiki modified | ||
#A fork of TikiWiki | #A fork of TikiWiki | ||
# | #MoinMoinWiki extended | ||
#something else supporting [[ConsuML]] | #something else supporting [[ConsuML]] | ||
Line 41: | Line 34: | ||
If a modified version will be used it makes sense to use many more namespaces to make the wiki more manageable, but on the other hand using standard MediaWiki has many advantages. Using unmodified MediaWiki would just require stricter syntax within the articles | If a modified version will be used it makes sense to use many more namespaces to make the wiki more manageable, but on the other hand using standard MediaWiki has many advantages. Using unmodified MediaWiki would just require stricter syntax within the articles | ||
According to MediaWiki developers adding numerous namespaces is easy so here is a brief and uncomplete list of likely namespaces | According to MediaWiki developers adding numerous namespaces is easy so here is a brief and uncomplete list of likely namespaces: | ||
*[[Company]]: | *[[Company]]: | ||
*[[Product]]: | *[[Product]]: | ||
*[[Product Group]]: | *[[Product Group]]: | ||
*[[ | *[[Campaign]] | ||
We need to start forming templates to advance the launch of the Content Wiki: | |||
*[[Company template]] | |||
*[[Product template]] | |||
*[[ProductGroup template]] | |||
*[[Campaign template]] | |||
*[[WorkDescription template]] | |||
---- | ---- | ||
==Article Structure== | ==Article Structure== | ||
Line 70: | Line 65: | ||
*Optional subarticles | *Optional subarticles | ||
When thinking about companies an outline of subarticle structure | When thinking about companies an outline of subarticle structure might be something like | ||
* [[Company X]] - containing [[product group]]s, [[brand]]s, [[product]]s etc. | |||
* [[Company X/ids]] (mandatory) - registered names, national registry numbers, d-u-n-s, stock symbols etc. | |||
* [[Company X/economy]] - subpaging further like [[Company X/economy/2003Q4]] | |||
* [[Company X/history]] | |||
* [[Company X/affiliated businesses]] | |||
* [[Company X/executives]] | |||
* [[Company X/advertising]] | |||
* [[Company X/labor practices]] | |||
* [[Company X/workplace upgrade requests]] | |||
* ... | * ... | ||