Editing Consumerium talk:Consumerians by fields of interest

[[User:N8chz|I]] am introducing this shameless replication of a Wikipedian concept in an effort to...

* clarify the nature and extent of Consumerium in a way some may find less abstract than a Mission Statement.

::Please read [[Consumerium Social Club]].  We have tried for a long time to resist the [[community point of view]] biases common at Wikipedia, which are responsible for a good deal of the [http://recyclopedia.info/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=Wikimedia_corruption corruption that results] when there is [http://recyclopedia.info/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=Wikimedia_point_of_view one priveleged group that all knows each other] and socializes with each other.

::Your idea is very sound.  But please rename it [[interests of Consumerium contributors]] or something else that does not imply we are a clique.  Thx - [[trolls]], who are not "Consumerians", not "Wikipedians", and wish to allow people to contribute without having to declare this kind of information about themselves.  [[Mandatory clique]]s have a name here:  they're called [[faction]]s, and they're used only to resolve serious disputes that we have no other fair way to resolve.

* take an informal inventory of humyn resources potentially available to a project of Consumerium's nature, whatever that is.

::It's sound to want to know what [[individual capital]] you have handy and who might know where to find what [[instructional capital]].  

::Also, it is policy to use [[Recyclopedia]] links rather than [[Wikipedia]] links to subject fields, since, given the converge in value systems with them.

If the Consumerium finds any of these topics to be off-topic, it is requested to waive non-subtractivity and summarily remove them from the list.

::Any user can do this obviously.

This should facilitate the first objective without a huge compromise of the second, unless of course my view of humyn nature is even more overly optimystic than even I had thought. Please forgive me for deficiencies in my understanding of Mediawikian outlining protocol.

::Please stop inventing cliques.  There is a [[wikitext standard]] pioneered by [[Mediawiki]].  There are [[naming convention]]s pioneered by [[Wikipedia]].  There is no "Mediawikian".  There is no "Consumerian".  There are "Wikipedians" and that is a ''bad'' thing, and provably so.

----
Or is this all redundant given [[Consumerium Concepts]]?
:No. [[Consumerium Concepts]] lists all sorts of legacy terms from "the XML" era. --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 22:18, 27 Mar 2004 (EET)
::[[XML dump]], [[XML import]] and [[XML exchange]] still matters - the [[wikitext standard]] doesn't solve all problems.

::Also, the [[rendezvous by interest]]s need not be restricted to just those interests relevant to this or other [[essential projects]], especially if it's just a [[Consumerium social club]].   Finding the [[interests of Consumerium contributors]] in common might be important to building [[social capital]] here.  Just please do not invent a [[mandatory clique]] called "Consumerian" that "[[Consumerium:We|we]] all must belong to or be considered anti-social."