Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in or
create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 36: |
Line 36: |
| *Use <nowiki>---- {{MSG:fromwi}}</nowiki> as a footer to mark articles adapted from [[Wikinfo]] | | *Use <nowiki>---- {{MSG:fromwi}}</nowiki> as a footer to mark articles adapted from [[Wikinfo]] |
| *Use <nowiki>---- {{MSG:fromrp}}</nowiki> as a footer to mark articles adapted from [[Recyclopedia]] | | *Use <nowiki>---- {{MSG:fromrp}}</nowiki> as a footer to mark articles adapted from [[Recyclopedia]] |
|
| |
| The [[GFDL]] does not actually require any such markings, nor should it (they would complicate combining the various sources, among other things, and make some user interfaces to the [[GFDL text corpus]] appear to be more important than others). However, they should be included where it is desirable that the reader add more information via another [[web service]]. Try to include links to those articles at those other services if a typical reader would likely have details or updates more relevant to them than to [[Consumerium Services]]. For instance, rather than get into the details of a misleading PR campaign here, it would be better to put that in [[Disinfopedia]]. And rather than allow some overly lengthy description of any one group or its good work, put that in [[Wikinfo]]. And if it's from a [[faction]] that is seeking something other than [[moral purchasing]], [[Recyclopedia]] will probably be more interested.
| |
|
| |
|
| ===Standards usage=== | | ===Standards usage=== |