Editing Consensual point of view

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
Similar to [[neutral point of view]] (also [[single point of view]]) but without the claim of objectiveness or absolute truth. [[Factionally defined]] terms are allowed but only in the context of explaining that faction's view.   
Similar to [[neutral point of view]] (also [[single point of view]]) but without the claim of objectiveness or absolute truth.


Such articles easily splinter into [[multiple point of view]], or are neutered.
See also: [[multiple point of view]].
''See [[non-neutral point of view]] for various perspectives on this neutering.''


The [[community point of view]] (with its attendant [[systemic bias]] and authorization of [[sysop vandalism]]) is itself a consensual point of view - where those who are "not part of the community" are held to count for nothing.
Examples:
 
''Examples:''


* C2 (WardsWiki)
* C2 (WardsWiki)
* [[Disinfopedia]]
'''See also:'''
*[[POVs]] - for a complete listing of different POV schemes proposed or in use elsewhere
Please note that all contributions to Consumerium development wiki are considered to be released under the GNU Free Documentation License 1.3 or later (see Consumerium:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)