Claims of corruption: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(Moeller example)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Wikipedia]] is the largest [[GFDL corpus access provider]]. It was [[usurper|usurped]] by [[Wikimedia]] from the actual [[GFDL corpus]] contributors in 2003.
[[Wikipedia]] (www.wikipedia.org) is a "copyleft" encyclopedia that is collaboratively developed using wiki software. It is the largest [[GFDL corpus access provider]]. Wikipedia is managed and operated by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation.
 
This article claims the encyclopedic project was [[usurper|usurped]] by [[Wikimedia]] from the actual [[GFDL corpus]] contributors in 2003.  


Since then it has been '''alleged''' to have become increasingly corrupt and unresponsive to those contributors and users, and to be serving the agenda of its [[sysop power structure]] instead.  ''Many'' specific allegations have been posted to the [[Wikipedia mailing list]], ''far'' too many to list here, and these seem to have increased in number over time.  This list includes only the most egregious and legally actionable allegations:
Since then it has been '''alleged''' to have become increasingly corrupt and unresponsive to those contributors and users, and to be serving the agenda of its [[sysop power structure]] instead.  ''Many'' specific allegations have been posted to the [[Wikipedia mailing list]], ''far'' too many to list here, and these seem to have increased in number over time.  This list includes only the most egregious and legally actionable allegations:
17

edits