Best cases: Difference between revisions

642 bytes added ,  15 August 2004
no edit summary
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 8: Line 8:


It never totally replaces other [[electronic payment services]] but tends to be influential in the [[standard]]s, especially [[privacy risk]] measures, that eventually make [[RFID]] acceptable, and limit [[cop]] access to [[user data]].
It never totally replaces other [[electronic payment services]] but tends to be influential in the [[standard]]s, especially [[privacy risk]] measures, that eventually make [[RFID]] acceptable, and limit [[cop]] access to [[user data]].
----
''Do any of the above seem unrealistic or impossible? Do you feel like deleting or toning it down? Don't, because someone believes in it. If you the author of it no longer believe in it, move it to [[visions]]. If you believe it is possible or likely, but unfortunate or bad, add a parallel case to [[worst cases]] emphasizing these aspects, and feel free to add some mention of those issues here, but with possible resolutions (keep best and worst separate even if they are exactly the same case - remember that these labels may well be [[factionally defined]] but we need to agree on at least a few basic ones to move forward). ''


(''see also [[visions]] for the more [[extreme standards|extreme]] case of this really working'')
(''see also [[visions]] for the more [[extreme standards|extreme]] case of this really working'')