Alternate wiki-implementations: Difference between revisions

    No edit summary
    No edit summary
    Line 9: Line 9:
    </tr>
    </tr>
    <td>
    <td>
    *Not humanly possible for [[end user feedback]] to reach developers
    *Not humanly possible for [[end user feedback]] to reach developers reliably
    *PHP based
    *PHP based
    *Proven to perform well under heavy load - but with hard limits
    *Proven to perform well under heavy load - but with hard limits
    Line 20: Line 20:
    </td>
    </td>
    <td>
    <td>
    *Not humanly possible for [[end user feedback]] to reach developers
    *Not humanly possible for [[end user feedback]] to reach developers at all - form for describing [[wiki feature request]] incomprehensible even to gurus.
    *PHP based
    *PHP based
    *meets ''many'' standards ([[CSS]], [[XHTML]], [[pear.php.net]], [[smarty.php.net]], [[RDF]]
    *meets ''many'' standards ([[CSS]], [[XHTML]], [[pear.php.net]], [[smarty.php.net]], [[RDF]]
    Line 29: Line 29:
    *Polls built in
    *Polls built in
    *Many developers doing lots of detail work on CM and CMS
    *Many developers doing lots of detail work on CM and CMS
    *supports ALL databases not just MySQL
    *supports Postgres, Oracle, Sybase and SQLite (built in PHP 5.0!) databases not just MySQL - strategic to integrate with some [[essential projects]]
    *developers [[eat their own dog food]] = run current beta as their live site for all development, so any problem is immediately obvious to every developer
    *developers [[eat their own dog food]] = run current beta as their live site for all development, so any problem is immediately obvious to every developer
    </td>
    </td>