Alternate wiki-implementations: Difference between revisions
being exact
(strategic necessity of browser restriction for some roles? like those only three or four well-equipped people have to take on) |
(being exact) |
||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
Dark horses include [[VeryQuickWiki]] (a [[Java wiki]]), [[UseMod]] (only advantage is that it dumps [[XML output]], very very very important until there is a real [[wikitext standard]]). | Dark horses include [[VeryQuickWiki]] (a [[Java wiki]]), [[UseMod]] (only advantage is that it dumps [[XML output]], very very very important until there is a real [[wikitext standard]]). | ||
Also [[Microsoft wiki]] will likely be out eventually, and some [[peer2peer]] options relying perhaps on [[XForms]] later. [[Microsoft Internet Explorer XML Support]] is an important constraint on which of these features can be used at all. It may be a wise tradeoff to support only MSIE for certain [[user role]]s. | Also [[Microsoft wiki]] will likely be out eventually, and some [[peer2peer]] options relying perhaps on [[XForms]] later. [[Microsoft Internet Explorer XML Support]] is an important constraint on which of these features can be used at all. It may be a wise tradeoff to support only MSIE for certain [[user role]]s, if these are ''always'' taken on by well-equipped well-supported people who can be far more easily supported by relying on IE's XML, than any other method. By the same argument, if Opera or Netscape does something uniquely well and only two or three people need that capability, requiring those might also make sense in some cases. | ||
---- | ---- | ||