Editing Ad hominem

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
'''"ad hominem"''' is a Latin phrase used very commonly in English (just like "ad nauseum", and also "i.e." and "e.g." are abbreviations of Latin phrases).  It is, effectively, part of English.
'''"ad hominem"''' is a Latin phrase used very commonly in English (just like "ad nauseum", and also "i.e." and "e.g." are abbreviations of Latin phrases).  It is, effectively, part of English.


What it means is, in the context of an argument, referring to '''who made the argument, as opposed to the argument's own referents''', in deciding whether to accept or reject it.  It is normally considered proof that one has no real argument to offer against or for what is said, if one must invoke "who wrote it" as an refutation or as a reason of non-acting upon it thus in silent approval of it.
What it means is, in the context of an argument, referring to '''who made the argument, as opposed to the argument's own referents''', in deciding whether to accept or reject it.  It is normally considered proof that one has no real argument to offer against what is said, if one must invoke "who wrote it" as an refutation.


'''Ad hominem''' is the weakest form of argument.  It is an attack or defense on an argument based on who made the argument, rather than based on its merits.
'''Ad hominem''' is the weakest form of argument.  It is an attack or defense on an argument based on who made the argument, rather than based on its merits.


Speculative attributions of motive are ad hominem (an observation of [[English Wikipedia User Bird]]) not to mention [[amateur psychiatry]] based usually on [[pop psychology]]. More seriously, and much more damaging:
[[Ad hominem revert]] is an obvious example, one common on [[large public wiki]]s and giving rise to calls for a [[revert currency]] to make such actions "not free".  [[Ad hominem delete]] is an example of this weak form raised to [[sysop vandalism]], a particularly stupid phenomenon encouraged mostly by [[Wikimedia]].


[[Ad hominem revert]] is common on [[large public wiki]]s.  It is so damaging that it gives rise to calls for a [[revert currency]] to make such actions "not free". 
Some [[trolls]] refuse to understand [[ad hominem approval]] wherein the edits of some known author do not fire up a desire to track their trail by following [[Special:Recentchanges]].
 
[[Ad hominem delete]] amplifies the reversion to [[sysop vandalism]], a particularly stupid phenomenon encouraged mostly by [[Wikimedia]] - a strong sign of its [[Wikimedia corruption]].
 
[[Trolls]] also disapprove of [[ad hominem approval]] wherein the edits of some known author do not fire up a desire to track their trail by following [[Special:Recentchanges]] and punishing their [[thoughtcrime]].
 
Tolerating any form of ad hominem attack (which insiders can get away with but outsiders can't) tends to create a hierarchy of insiders and thus an [[insider culture]] similar to that of [[bureaucracy]] or [[academia]], where a trusted name can spout nonsense for years without being detected or kicked out, and where untrusted names with proof of their claims get ignored.
 
[[Category:Ad hominem]]
Please note that all contributions to Consumerium development wiki are considered to be released under the GNU Free Documentation License 1.3 or later (see Consumerium:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)